I was a cross country runner at Cornell
University from 2001 to 2003. The city of Ithaca New York, where you
will find Cornell, is beautiful because of its rather balanced
relationship with the natural environment. In Ithaca, you will find
waterfalls, gorges, hills, woods, and Cayuga lake, among other
wonders of nature. And as a runner I had the special opportunity to
know these places in the intimate way that only running, hiking, or
biking can offer.
Our team would leave from Bartel's Hall
and follow one of many paths that covered anywhere between 5 and 30
kilometers. There was one path that was mostly pavement –
relatively quiet streets shaded by trees lining the road, along which
there were modest, middle and upper middle class homes with yards and
dogs and so forth. On this running loop (I forget the name of it
now), there was this one house in particular that had two dogs and
they would always, without fail, dart out of where ever they were and
race toward the street where were were running. And they would be
barking madly.
A dog's bark betrays the emotions
and/or intentions of the dog. Whereas the dog may simply want to
show that it is excited or happy, the bark, at least to the human
ears, sounds the same as the bark of an angry attack or a threat.
I remember the first runs, responding with fear,
thinking that the dogs would come chase after me and bite me, which
is not unheard of. It took me a few times to not be afraid or to
respond with my own “bark” to show that they weren't going to
psychologically dominate me, and they would either retreat or stop
barking and run more calmly behind me until they determined they were
far enough away from their home or running with me simply wasn't as
fun without the barking.
My self-awareness evolved considerably,
I'd say, because of these dogs. After conquering my reaction and
indeed rendering it a conscious response to their barking, I still
had a sensation of annoyance. “Why do these dogs always
come barking every
time we run by?” I thought to myself each time. And this irritated
me. I thought that the dogs were irritating me and felt that irritation evolve on its own, conquering my opinions of dogs in
general, even, creating limits within my heart and mind, reinforcing
the feeling of irritation with the labor of constructing arguments to
the end of validating my reaction.
The
truth is, the dog is a dog. Dogs bark. That is a part of what they
do. I don't underestimate the dog's sensitivities and capacities.
Indeed, I am sure that the dog has an awareness equal to mine,
even though I could not tell you how it is equal and in what ways a
dog, specifically, is aware and spiritual and so forth. But I
believe it.
I am a
human being. At least in terms of rational thinking, the dog and I
are not equals. From the human stand point, it is less the dogs
responsibility to stop barking and “behave” then it is my
responsibility to not permit the dog to have the power of irritating
me. In the end, it is my
emotional response. Correction: it was my emotional reaction
that the dog elicited.
Much
later, years later, it occurred to me that the special feature of my
being is that I can train myself to respond in a manner that protects
my peace, my happiness, or whatever it is I wish to preserve. This
is the difference between reacting and responding. The dog was
reacting to our passing by. The dog had no reason to change his
reaction, no reason to fashion a response. I did. My reaction was
my problem and, as a
human being, I had to do the intellectual labor of reshaping that
reactive energy so that it did not perturb me. If my emotions bother me, it is my responsibility to examine why and see what I can I can do to alter my response before I blame whom or whatever elicited said reaction.
"This, I think, is the definition of 'response-ability'", barked the dog day after day to me -- I just didn't understand, at the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment